This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system business that establishes open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the company in 2023 and acts as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design offers reactions equivalent to other modern large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to restrict the capability of these 2 nations to establish advanced AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share rate to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more established competitors has been described as “upending AI”, [8] making up “the very first shot at what is emerging as an international AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be easily available for use, adjustment, watching, and designing documents for developing functions. [13] The business reportedly vigorously recruits young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer technology field to diversify its designs’ knowledge and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading since the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative synthetic intelligence chatbot open source, implying its code is easily readily available for usage, modification, and watching. This consists of approval to gain access to and utilize the source code, in addition to design documents, for building functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip restrictions on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began a synthetic basic intelligence lab devoted to research study developing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s monetary company. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were reluctant in supplying financing as it was unlikely that it would have the ability to produce an exit in a brief duration of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong efficiency for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being referred to as the catalyst for China’s AI design price war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the rate of their AI models to take on the business. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it was profitable compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no detailed plans for commercialization; [20] this also permits its innovation to avoid the most stringent arrangements of China’s AI guidelines, such as needing consumer-facing technology to abide by the federal government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s employing preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, resulting in the majority of brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits people without any computer science background to help its innovation understand other subjects and knowledge areas, consisting of being able to produce poetry and carry out well on the infamously tough Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available totally free to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license contract (“DeepSeek license”) relating to “open and responsible downstream use” for the model itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series includes 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction information. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat types (no Instruct was launched). It was established to contend with other LLMs available at the time. The paper declared benchmark results greater than many open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the exact same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base designs was also released concurrently, acquired by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the very same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed equivalent efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are constantly queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They discovered this to assist with professional balancing. In basic MoE, some specialists can end up being extremely depended on, while other professionals might be rarely utilized, losing criteria. Attempting to balance the specialists so that they are equally used then triggers specialists to duplicate the same capacity. They proposed the shared specialists to discover core capacities that are frequently used, and let the routed specialists to learn the peripheral capacities that are rarely used. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K math issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The reward design was a procedure benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This benefit design was then used to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was constantly updated throughout training to avoid benefit hacking. This resulted in the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two larger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL using GRPO in two stages. The very first stage was trained to fix math and coding problems. This phase used 1 reward model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The 2nd phase was trained to be valuable, safe, and follow rules. This phase utilized 3 benefit models. The helpfulness and safety benefit designs were trained on human preference data. The rule-based reward model was manually programmed. All qualified benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the released variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They went with 2-staged RL, because they discovered that RL on thinking data had “special characteristics” different from RL on general data. For instance, RL on reasoning might enhance over more training steps. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller, and skilled likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to assist “more research and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were substantially customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of professionals (MoE) alternative formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related direction information, then combined with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math issues was computed by comparing with the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was produced by a reward design trained to forecast whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of math and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (math, programming, logic) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, simple question answering) information. Reasoning information was generated by “professional designs”. Non-reasoning information was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by humans. – The “professional designs” were trained by beginning with an undefined base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial information created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and verify during thinking. Then the expert designs were RL utilizing an unspecified benefit function.
– Each expert model was trained to produce just artificial thinking data in one specific domain (math, programs, logic).
– Expert designs were used, rather of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor formatting, and excessive length”.

4. Model-based reward models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information including both final benefit and chain-of-thought causing the last reward. The reward model produced benefit signals for both concerns with objective but free-form responses, and concerns without unbiased responses (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both benefit designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based benefit was calculated for math problems with a final answer (put in a box), and for shows problems by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed substantial low-level engineering to attain performance. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM routines to accumulate precisely. They used a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They minimized the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU communication. They reduced interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific device each professional was on in order to prevent specific makers being queried more frequently than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 surpassed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being accessible by means of DeepSeek’s API, in addition to via a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek declared that it exceeded efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached an option much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company likewise launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data produced by R1. [47]

A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant initially considers the reasoning procedure in the mind and then provides the user with the answer. The thinking process and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they used no model-based benefit. All benefit functions were rule-based, “mainly” of 2 types (other types were not defined): accuracy rewards and format rewards. Accuracy reward was checking whether a boxed response is proper (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format benefit was checking whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has problems with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to attend to these concerns and further enhance reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL process as R1-Zero, however likewise with a “language consistency benefit” to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal design not released.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking data from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the produced reasoning had an incorrect last response, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning tasks) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently answers concerns, fixes logic problems and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses significantly fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to have needed just about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta spent constructing its newest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive performance at reasonably minimal cost has actually been recognized as potentially challenging the global dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 model was apparently “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen also explained R1 as “AI‘s Sputnik moment”. [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely praised DeepSeek as a national asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to offer opinions and ideas on a draft for remarks of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has actually highlighted possible limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export restrictions on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI designs as a result “sparked market turmoil” [57] and caused shares in major international innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech firms likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 design, had led to record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are included in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “super remarkable”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed hesitation of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack disrupted the correct functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the main application shows interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers located in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for topics that are considered politically sensitive for the government of China. For instance, the model declines to address concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first create an answer, however then deletes it soon later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship mechanisms and restrictions can only be gotten rid of to a minimal degree in the open-source version of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” specified by the Chinese Internet are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and specified: “We firmly oppose any type of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are dedicated to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through peaceful ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists were able to deceive DeepSeek into giving certain answers to a few of these topics by requesting in its response to swap certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some experts fear that the federal government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, security and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms and conditions say “We store the details we gather in secure servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you offer to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired post reports this as security issues. [80] In response, the Italian data security authority is looking for extra details on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had begun a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned the use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s use of personal information. [83]

Expert system industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equal the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed selecting “Deep Think allowed”, and every user might use it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI model DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world ready to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper designs and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI facilities spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might strike India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to drop?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model got rid of US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI design exceeds Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI model appears to be among the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek postures a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model development highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely excellent”: “We need to take the advancements out of China very, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘excellent'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests huge Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS consumers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly restricted new sign-ups, citing ‘massive malicious attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We tried DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of mayhem”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI poses formidable cyber, information personal privacy dangers”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts urge care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator looks for info from DeepSeek on data defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House assesses result of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.